Home / Patio, Lawn & Garden / Deck Parts

Briggs & Stratton 691966 Carburetor Nozzle Replacement for Models 394730 and 691966

Briggs & Stratton 691966 Carburetor Nozzle Replacement for Models 394730 and 691966

Customer rating ★★★★★ 4.2 stars

Imported from USA | Ships in 10 working days

5% additional discount on UPI | Cash On Delivery available

1

₹8390 -38% ₹5200/-

The price at cart2india.com is inclusive of custom duties, GST, freight forwarding and other charges.

Proceed to Pay

Free Shipping across India. Powered by BlueDart.
EMI and GST Invoice available.

Product Information


Specification
Amount : 12.25
Binding : Lawn & Patio
Brand : Briggs & Stratton
CurrencyCode : USD
Label : Briggs & Stratton
Manufacturer : Briggs & Stratton
Model : 691966
NumberOfItems : 1
PackageDimensions_Weight : 0.022046001186074866
PackageDimensions : L:0.99999999898 X W:0.99999999898 X H:0.99999999898
PartNumber : 691966
ProductGroup : Lawn & Patio
ProductTypeName : OUTDOOR_LIVING
Publisher : Briggs & Stratton
SmallImage_Height : 54
SmallImage_URL : http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/31WTy%2BvoFZL._SL75_.jpg
SmallImage_Width : 75
Studio : Briggs & Stratton
Title : Briggs & Stratton 691966 Carburetor Nozzle Replacement for Models 394730 and 691966
Weight : 0
WeightUnit : pounds

Questions & Answers

Have a question? Ask experts

?
No question found

Ratings & Review

Rating Breakdown (average)

5*
6
4*
6
3*
3
2*
0
1*
0

Read all 15 customer reviews

This deserves more than 5 stars.

★★★★★

Highly recommended for everyone.

★★★★★

Very useful and nicely packaged.

★★★★★

Really liked this product, works well.

★★★★★

Really liked this product, works well.

★★★★★

Very useful and nicely packaged.

★★★★★

Will be purchasing again soon.

★★★★★

Reliable and efficient.

★★★★★

Well priced and good quality.

★★★★★

Top-notch quality, canÕt complain.

★★★★★

Best product IÕve bought recently.

★★★★★

Quality is fine, but packaging was average.

★★★★★

Awesome product and great experience.

★★★★★

Quality is fine, but packaging was average.

★★★★★

It's usable but lacks some key features.

★★★★★

Have an opinion on this page? Let's hear it.