Home / Patio, Lawn & Garden / Grass Catchers

Stens 365-221 Grass Bag, Replaces Exmark: 1-653566, 103-0431, 116-0757, Fits Exmark: Lazer Rear baggers, Hardware and Frame NOT Included

Stens 365-221 Grass Bag, Replaces Exmark: 1-653566, 103-0431, 116-0757, Fits Exmark: Lazer Rear baggers, Hardware and Frame NOT Included

Customer rating ★★★★★ 4.5 stars

Imported from USA | Ships in 10 working days

5% additional discount on UPI | Cash On Delivery available

1

₹32130 -34% ₹21200/-

The price at cart2india.com is inclusive of custom duties, GST, freight forwarding and other charges.

Proceed to Pay

Free Shipping across India. Powered by BlueDart.
EMI and GST Invoice available.

Product Information


Specification
Amount : 95.43
Binding : Lawn & Patio
Brand : Stens
Color : Black
CurrencyCode : USD
Label : Stens
Manufacturer : Stens
MaterialType : Nylon
Model : 365-221
NumberOfItems : 1
PackageDimensions_Weight : 1.9999999983228188
PackageDimensions : L:13.799999985924 X W:10.799999988984000787401574 X H:4.799999995104
PartNumber : 365-221
ProductGroup : BISS
ProductTypeName : WASTE_BAG
Publisher : Stens
SmallImage_Height : 75
SmallImage_URL : https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51p+RvxoORL._SL75_.jpg
SmallImage_Width : 75
Studio : Stens
Title : Stens 365-221 Grass Bag, Replaces Exmark: 1-653566, 103-0431, 116-0757, Fits Exmark: Lazer Rear baggers, Hardware and Frame NOT Included
Weight : 2
WeightUnit : pounds

Questions & Answers

Have a question? Ask experts

?
No question found

Ratings & Review

Rating Breakdown (average)

5*
8
4*
3
3*
2
2*
0
1*
0

Read all 13 customer reviews

Remarkably good and exceeded all expectations.

★★★★★

Flawless in both function and design.

★★★★★

Five stars all the way.

★★★★★

Top-notch quality, canÕt complain.

★★★★★

A smart purchase for the price.

★★★★★

High quality and great value.

★★★★★

Impressive quality and durability.

★★★★★

This deserves more than 5 stars.

★★★★★

IÕd consider buying again.

★★★★★

Meets expectations, good buy.

★★★★★

The product is decent but could be improved.

★★★★★

It's usable but lacks some key features.

★★★★★

Best in its category!

★★★★★

Have an opinion on this page? Let's hear it.