Home / Computers & Accessories / Printer Memory Modules

512MB Printer Memory RAM for Lexmark C782n, C782 n XL Series. Equivalent to 13N1526, 1022301 (PARTS-QUICK)

512MB Printer Memory RAM for Lexmark C782n, C782 n XL Series. Equivalent to 13N1526, 1022301 (PARTS-QUICK)

Customer rating ★★★★★ 4.1 stars

Imported from USA | Ships in 10 working days

5% instant discount on UPI | Cash On Delivery available

1

₹ 9900/-

The price at cart2india.com is inclusive of custom duties, GST, freight forwarding and other charges.

Proceed to Pay

Free Shipping across India. Powered by BlueDart

Product Information

Editorial Review
512MB 100 pin DDR DIMM SODIMM for Lexmark. Parts-Quick Equivalent to Lexmark Part Numbers: 13N1526, 1022301, 40X5939. BEWARE! DO NOT BUY FROM OTHER VENDORS WHO CLAIM THEY ARE SELLING PARTS-QUICKBRAND. OUR WARRANTY IS ONLY FOR ITEMS PURCHASED DIRECTLY FROM PARTS-QUICK. ALL PRODUCTS BRANDED AS PARTS-QUICK ARE TO BE SOLD SOLELY BY PARTS-QUICK. PARTS-QUICK DOES NOT AUTHORIZE THE USE OF IT'S BRANDED PRODUCTS TO OTHER SELLERS. . Compatible with: Lexmark C782n, C782 n XL Series.

Features
1) Form Factor: 100 pin DDR DIMM Printer Memory
2) Warranty: Lifetime
3) Capacity: 512MB

Specification
Binding : Personal Computers
Brand : parts-quick
EAN : 0608938620361
Label : parts-quick
Manufacturer : parts-quick
ProductGroup : PC Accessory
ProductTypeName : RAM_MEMORY
Publisher : parts-quick
Studio : parts-quick
Title : 512MB Printer Memory RAM for Lexmark C782n, C782 n XL Series. Equivalent to 13N1526, 1022301 (PARTS-QUICK)

Questions & Answers

Have a question? Ask experts

?
No question found

Ratings & Review

Rating Breakdown (average)

5*
4
4*
1
3*
3
2*
0
1*
0

Read all 8 customer reviews

Stunning design and excellent performance.

★★★★★

Highly recommended for everyone.

★★★★★

Very functional and easy to use.

★★★★★

Does the job but nothing extraordinary.

★★★★★

Everything about this is perfect.

★★★★★

This deserves more than 5 stars.

★★★★★

A mixed experience overall.

★★★★★

Quality is fine, but packaging was average.

★★★★★

Have an opinion on this page? Let's hear it.