New Look U06352A Misses' Dress Sewing Pattern Packet, Code 6352, Sizes 8-10-12-14-16-18

Customer rating 4.7 stars

Imported from USA | Ships in 10 working days

5% additional discount on UPI | Cash On Delivery available

1

₹4180 -33% ₹2800/-

The price at cart2india.com is inclusive of custom duties, GST, freight forwarding and other charges.

Free Shipping across India. Powered by BlueDart

Product Information

Editorial Review
Misses Dress sewing pattern. New Look pattern 6352, part of New Look Spring 1995 Collection. Pattern for 4 looks. For sizes A (8-10-12-14-16-18).

Features
1) Misses Dresses in size A (8-10-12-14-16-18), New Look Pattern #6352
2) Number of looks included: 4
3) Designed in UK, Manufactured in USA
4) Instructions are written in English, Spanish, and French
5) Suggested fabrics: Crinkled Gauze, Laundered Cottons, Silks and Silk Types, Crepe, Crepon, Laundered Silks/Rayons, Sueded Silks/Rayons; not suitable for obvious diagonals; for pile, shaded or 1-way design fabrics, use with nap yardages/layouts

Specification
Binding : Kitchen
Brand : Simplicity Creative Group Inc - Patterns
EAN : 0039363167846
Label : Simplicity Creative Patterns
Manufacturer : Simplicity Creative Patterns
Model : 6352
PackageDimensions_Weight : 0.20 pounds
PackageDimensions : L:8.00 X W:5.20 X H:0.40
ProductGroup : Art and Craft Supply
ProductTypeName : HOME
Publisher : Simplicity Creative Patterns
Size : A (8-10-12-14-16-18)
Studio : Simplicity Creative Patterns
Title : New Look Sewing Pattern 6352 Misses Dresses, Size A (8-10-12-14-16-18)

Questions & Answers

Have a question? Ask experts

?
No question found

Ratings & Review

Rating Breakdown (average)

5*
8
4*
1
3*
1
2*
0
1*
0

Read all 10 customer reviews

Stunning design and excellent performance.

Expected a bit more for the price.

Perfect for my needs.

Feels premium and well-crafted.

Impressive quality and durability.

High quality and great value.

CouldnÕt be happier with this purchase.

Lives up to the hype.

Five stars all the way.

IÕd consider buying again.

Have an opinion on this page? Let's hear it.